找回密碼
 登記成會員
搜索
查看: 14454|回復: 7

[推介/評論] UV filters test (Eng) 24款不同牌子型號UV filter 比較

[複製鏈接]
發表於 6-3-2012 01:18:10 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

登記成為會員,看更多精采內容!

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有賬號?登記成會員

×
最近想買 UV filter 當為 Protector 用,一直都懷疑不同牌子 UV filters 可以有幾倍的價錢上落,表現又是不是真的差天共地?
以下一篇外國文章或者可以為大家提供少少指引:

3111_filtry-all2.jpg

Screen Shot 2012-03-06 at 上午01.09.20.png
...The first three winners will definitely be a surprise for most experienced photographers (as they were for us). Three of the top four filters are manufactured by the same firm – Hoya –  which handily took first and second place. The very popular and famous MRC B+W filter was only able to gain a third place finish. The key to success appeared to be good UV ray reduction and high transmission in the visible light range. The Hoya products performed the best in this category. We definitely have to add that there couldn’t be any mistake or any subjective evaluation. Most points in our test were accumulated solely based on the parameters that were measured by the spectrophotometer, which obviously is an objective and precise piece of equipment. And the fact that the filter that costs only 79 Polish zloty earned the highest number of points is very reassuring!  As far as the B+W filter is concerned we need to mention that this company offers products targeted mostly at the 415 or 420 nm radiation wave. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to find these filters from any Polish distributor and therefore we couldn’t test them.  
We were very disappointed with the Heliopan products. The German filters are not only very expensive, but they also presented very mediocre optical parameters.
We were also surprised with the low 8th position of the WPC coatings used by the top model Marumi filter. Although this filter has the highest light transmission in the visible range and has a very small tendency for flares, it only barely blocks the UV radiation, which should be its primary function after all. Why would we need a UV filter which cuts out the same amount of UV radiation as a regular glass? However this filter can be useful for people, who want to protect their lens from the outer factors. Thanks to its visible range features, it will pass this part of the exam perfectly.
The last three filters – the Hoya UV G series, King UV and Tiffen UV – were no better than good quality window glass. It is cruel to say but true. During our testing we put a piece of regular glass and a very worn out lens from our colleague’s reading glasses in the spectrophotometer to compare the results. As far as the light transmission is concerned the old reading glass lens was much better than all three filters, and the regular window glass wasn’t much further behind. Too bad…



文章的測試結果是以精密的光學儀器去測試,文中稱「...there couldn’t be any mistake or any subjective evaluation. Most points in our test were accumulated solely based on the parameters...」,所以結果非常科學化、客觀。
非常令他們驚訝,排首3位的 filter 都是 HOYA,而名牌 B+W 只排在第3(第1名有兩塊),而價錢,首位的 HOYA HMC UV-O 只是 B+W 010 UV Haze MRC 的一半。
HOYA 是日本專門出鏡片的大廠,亦即是我們所熟知的 Kenko 的母公司,果然有一定水準。

原文 http://www.lenstip.com/113.1-art ... t_Introduction.html



發表於 6-3-2012 09:14:02 | 顯示全部樓層
都冇響永成三千幾蚊一塊、"好多人用"果隻 R 字頭嘅 UV filter ??
 樓主| 發表於 6-3-2012 09:47:26 | 顯示全部樓層
我估係太貴,D測試人員買唔起…
發表於 6-3-2012 10:20:44 | 顯示全部樓層
冇"R"品牌, 測試唔夠中肯, 我唔服
 樓主| 發表於 6-3-2012 12:15:40 | 顯示全部樓層
總之我以後安安樂樂買 HOYA HMC O  
發表於 6-3-2012 17:43:36 | 顯示全部樓層
5百內可以接受, HOYA 印象麻麻地, 用開都係 KENKO 及 B+W, 據 Sales 講貴 Filter 易清理, 用落都覺是, 因我習慣即場用衫尾抺, B+W 易清理, KENKO 差些少。
 樓主| 發表於 6-3-2012 17:52:15 | 顯示全部樓層
c_Foo 發表於 6-3-2012 05:43 PM
5百內可以接受, HOYA 印象麻麻地, 用開都係 KENKO 及 B+W, 據 Sales 講貴 Filter 易清理, 用落都覺是, 因我 ...

咁你又o岩,呢個測試只係試透光度、眩光果D光學表現。並沒有考慮清潔、鏡片硬度果類~
發表於 7-3-2012 00:18:31 | 顯示全部樓層
鏡片透光度一定 ROLLEI 贏哂, Sales 話帶咗等於冇帶, 極力推薦
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 登記成會員

本版積分規則

聯絡|手機版|香港大笪地

GMT+8, 15-6-2024 06:20 AM

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2024 Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表